Why Scott Pruitt Is A ‘Dangerous’ Choice To Lead The EPA
He has threatened to undermine protections for air and water.
President Donald Trump is <a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-climate-change-action_us_5847dd05e4b08c82e888db36?kqqhr4fjbss9py14i”>no environmental champion</a>, however even he has mentioned it is “vitally essential” to have “<a href=”https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html” goal=”_blank”>crystal clear</a>” air and water.<robust> </robust>Pruitt, nevertheless, has confirmed himself to be antagonistic to even this concept. <br><br>Since taking workplace as Oklahoma’s lawyer common in 2011, Pruitt has sued the Environmental Protection Agency on a number of events in an effort to overturn guidelines limiting air air pollution from energy crops — together with the <a href=”https://www.epa.gov/csapr”>Cross-State Air Pollution Rule</a>, which curbs energy plant emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, and the <a href=”https://www.epa.gov/mats/epa-announces-mercury-and-air-toxics-standards-mats-power-plants-rules-and-fact-sheets”>Mercury and Air Toxics Standards</a>, which place limits on the quantity of mercury, arsenic and different poisonous air pollution.<br><br>As Elliott Negin, a senior author at<robust> </robust>the Union of Concerned Scientists, <a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elliott-negin/trump-epa-nominee-scott-p_b_13932232.html” goal=”_blank”>defined in January</a>, these are each life-saving rules: “Taken collectively, they’re <a href=”https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/Benefits/casprmats.pdf”>projected</a> to forestall 18,000 to 46,000 untimely deaths throughout the nation and save $150 billion to $380 billion in well being care prices yearly. In Pruitt’s residence state, the 2 rules would avert as many as 720 untimely deaths and save as a lot as $5.9 billion per yr.”<br><br>Pruitt <a href=”http://www.tulsaworld.com/information/courts/oklahoma-attorney-general-scott-pruitt-sues-epa-again/article_c603ba08-dd62-5b0a-ad3e-e4b8d0e2d977.html”>sued</a> the EPA in 2015 over the <a href=”http://www2.epa.gov/websites/manufacturing/information/2015-05/paperwork/rule_preamble_web_version.pdf” goal=”_blank”>Waters of the United States rule</a> – which, in a bit co-written with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), he <a href=”http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/234685-epa-water-rule-is-blow-to-americans-private-property-rights”>known as</a> the “best blow to personal property rights the fashionable period has seen.” The <a href=”http://information.nationalgeographic.com/2016/11/trump-public-lands-waters-united-states-environment/” goal=”_blank”>rule</a>, which is presently tied up within the courts, extends EPA safety to tens of thousands and thousands of acres of wetlands and thousands and thousands of miles of streams, together with people who <a href=”https://www.nrdc.org/points/enforce-clean-water-act” goal=”_blank”>1 in three Americans depend on for ingesting water</a>.<br><br>Pruitt additionally sued the EPA over its <a href=”https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/2015-revision-2008-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-supporting” goal=”_blank”>2015 regulation</a> strengthening the nationwide well being requirements <a href=”http://newsok.com/oklahoma-joins-five-states-in-suit-against-new-epa-ozone-limits/article/5456440?custom_click=rss” goal=”_blank”>for ground-level ozone</a> or smog air pollution.<br><br>Several of those lawsuits are nonetheless ongoing, and environmental advocates have known as on Pruitt to recuse himself from selections associated to the rules he’s challenged in court docket. Legal specialists advised Bloomberg, nevertheless, that they knew of <a href=”https://www.bna.com/epa-foe-pruitt-n73014448247/” goal=”_blank”>no guidelines in place</a> that may compel such an motion on Pruitt’s half.<br><br>“Every American must be appalled that President-elect Trump simply picked somebody who has made a profession of being a vocal defender for polluters to go our Environmental Protection Agency,” Trip Van Noppen, president of Earthjustice, <a href=”http://earthjustice.org/information/press/2016/earthjustice-responds-to-president-elect-trump-s-pick-to-head-the-environmental-protection-agency” goal=”_blank”>mentioned</a> in a December 2016 assertion. “He has fought Environmental Protection Agency air pollution limits on poisonous substances like soot and mercury that put us all in danger for elevated most cancers, childhood bronchial asthma and different well being issues. He falsely claims that fracking doesn’t contaminate ingesting water provides.”